NFL Combine results Rankings grades for quarterbacks from C.J. Stroud Anthony Richardson to Max Duggan
NFL Combine results Rankings grades for quarterbacks from C.J. Stroud Anthony Richardson to Max Duggan
Blog Article
With the exception of Alabama's Bryce Young, the consensus No. 1 quarterback prospect in 2023 NFL Draft, the top QB options in the cla s all worked out to some degree at the NFL Combine on Saturday afternoon. And while Ohio State's C.J. Stroud, Florida's Anthony Richardson and Kentucky's Will Levis battled to see who is closest to Young on the board, later-round picks such as Georgia's Stetson Bennett, TCU's Max Duggan and BYU's Jaren Hall also tried to make a statement. MORE: In between those groups, Tenne see's . He's still not fully recovered from the ACL tear he suffered last November. In all, 13 QBs did the pa sing drills, and some also tried to impre s in the agility drills. The Sporting News ranks and grades them all: NFL Combine results: Rankings, grades of QB performances 1. C.J. Stroud, Ohio State (6-3, 214 pounds) Grade: A Stroud was smooth, as expected, and his accuracy was on point. He backed up the big talk about his ball placement. He proved why he was a prolific and efficient pa ser in Columbus. Stroud doesn't get enough credit for how he can create on the move in the pa sing game. His experience and polish in a pro-favorable system under Ryan Day was on full display. He did Joc Pederson Jersey nothing to slip from his status as second to Young, and he still could push Young by the end of the draft proce s. MORE: (Getty Images) 2. Anthony Richardson, Florida (6-4, 244 pounds) Grade: A If the NFL Combine truly was the "Underwear Olympics," then Richardson would have stood at the top of podium as the gold medalist among QBs. He of 40-yard dash (4.43 seconds), vertical jump (40 1/2 inches) and broad jump (10 feet, 9 inches). When it came to throwing, Richardson showed a different kind of upside with his big arm. launching rockets with ease. The potential is there for a player with limited experience. While Young and Stroud have established a high floor for NFL stardom, Richardson is building a higher ceiling. MORE: 3. Will Levis, Kentucky (6-4, 229 pounds) Grade: A- Levis promised and indeed the ball exploded out of his hand in downfield pa sing drills. He also had extra zip on shorter routes and seemed to use levitation in dropping in deeper shots with beautiful trajectories. Levis also showed he could move to make throws out of the pocket. He did his best to push Stroud. 4. Aidan O'Connell, Purdue (6-3, 213 pounds) Grade: B+ O'Connell proved he is a well-rounded pocket pa ser with the ideal frame. Working out down the road from his college home, he made most of throws well and showed a variety of touch. He was more Trevor Bauer Jersey impre sive than expected with his deep throws. He made a case to be taken after Hooker on Day 2. 5. Dorian Thompson-Robinson, UCLA (6-2, 203 pounds) Grade: B Thompson-Robinson ripped the ball in the speed drill (62 mph), and there was great zip to his pa ses when throwing the various routes. He also ran very well behind Richardson. DTR proved he is a fine all-around athlete with pop to go with his intangibles. 6. Stetson Bennett, Georgia (5-11, 192 pounds) Grade: B- Bennett has two things working against him his age (25) and lack of ideal height and weight. But he is athletic for his compact frame, and although he continued to be inconsistent with his pa sing, he showed he could sling the NFL-style deep ball better than most. He has the feel of a Day 3 backup in the Brock Purdy mold. MORE: 7. Jaren Hall, BYU (6-0, 207 pounds) Grade: B- Hall labored to push the ball downfield, to the point his deep arm was disappointing, more so working inside than outside. He moved well and showed good accuracy on short to intermediate routes, but he mi sed an opportunity to boost his draft stock after a solid Senior Bowl week. 8. Malik Cunningham, Louisville (6-0, 192 pounds) Grade: B- Cunningham went to the same school as Lamar Jackson, and he flashed some of Jackson's athletic and deep-ball traits during his workout. His overall pa sing is raw. He could turn out to be a versatile, mobile backup in the Tyrod Taylor mold if he lands in the right system as a late-round pick or priority free agent. MORE: 9. Jake Haener, Fresno State (6-0, 207 pounds) Jackie Robinson Jersey ;Grade: C Haener has become a late-round sleeper because of his big arm and surprising zip. Although Bennett got some wows for his throws, Haener's deep ball came in second to Levis' when the first group of QBs worked out. Haener doesn't offer much mobility, however, so he needs to rely a ton on his pocket presence and smarts. He's a late-round project at best. 10. Clayton Tune, Houston (6-2 1/2, 220 pounds) Grade: C Tune came in looking the part and there's some upside with his deep ball, but it was flat for much of his workout. He can move well for his size when he needs to throw downfield, but he tends be inconsistent working in the pocket. 11. Tanner McKee, Stanford (6-6, 231 pounds) Grade: C McKee was a much-hyped prospect entering college, but he was hurt by not having enough support. He has Joe Flacco-like size and pocket presence, but he didn't display the same kind of deep-ball ease. He will need to compete hard for a backup job in the NFL. Getty Images 12. Max Duggan, TCU (6-1 1/2, 207 pounds) Grade: C- Duggan, Bennett's national championship counterpart, stands out with plus athleticism and ball placement despite not having the strongest arm in relation to the QBs above him. But here he was erratic and suffered a real letdown in his accuracy. Duggan remains a long shot to be drafted. 13. Tyson Bagent, Shepherd (6-3, 210 pounds) Grade: C- Bagent is on the radar as after showing competitive accuracy and athleticism. The concern is with his arm: he struggles to make decisions and release the ball quickly.
https://cruzxnco53198.aboutyoublog.com/29738609/giants-2024-schedule-ranking-every-game-from-toughest-to-easiest
Click here Click here